48-Title: Appraisal of conception rate in AI bred cattle in rural areas of Rajasthan

48-Title: Appraisal of conception rate in AI bred cattle in rural areas of Rajasthan

Authors: Santosh Bansal, Barkha Gupta, Raviraj Jadhav, Vinod Potdar and Anuj Dixit

Source: Ruminant Science (2022)-11(2):497-502.

How to cite this manuscript: Bansal Santosh, Gupta Barkha, Jadhav Raviraj, Potdar Vinod and Dixit Anuj (2022). Appraisal of conception rate in AI bred cattle in rural areas of Rajasthan. Ruminant Science 11(2):497-502.

Abstract

A study was performed for a period of approx. 4 years (2018 to 2021) at various BAIF cattle development centres (CDC) in five districts of Rajasthan state to evaluate the effects of genetic and environmental factors on conception rate with 7414 cows of four breeds. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential factors affecting the conception rate in artificially inseminated cattle under field conditions/ farmer’s situation of Rajasthan state so that effective delivery of A.I. services can be ensured to the farmers, leading to enhanced productivity of animals. The experimental cows were within zero to 6th parity and were inseminated artificially by using the semen from sires of three different breeds. The study revealed that the overall conception rate (CR) was 49.68% which is better than the national average conception rate (35%). It was observed from statistical analysis of data that the conception rate of the cows was significantly affected by district, cattle breed (P<0.01) and body condition (P<0.05) while there was no significant difference (P>0.05) found due to sire’s breed and lactation number/parity of cows. CR was found to be highest in Rajsamand district (61.35%) and lowest in Chittaurgarh (47.69%) district. The overall conception rate significantly varied with the breed of cattle (P<0.01) reflecting the highest CR in non-descript (ND) cattle followed by crossbred Jersey cows. In conclusion, genetic as well as non-genetic factors contribute to attaining maximum conception rate and improving genetic potential in cows which results in increased productivity.

References

Anitha A, Rao S, Ramana J V and Reddy SPVV (2005). Body condition score and its relation to age and physical parameters in crossbreed cows. Indian Veterinary Journal 82:305-08.

Badinga L, Collier RJ, Thatcher WW and Wilcox CJ (1985). Effects of climatic and management factors on conception rate of dairy cattle in subtropical environment. Journal of Dairy Science 68(1):78-85.

Balakrishnan V (2003). Role of nutrition in reproduction. National Seminar on Strategies for Genetic and Reproductive Improvement in Bovine. Madras Veterinary College, 13–14 November, pp 144-46.

Bansal SK, Bhagat RL, Sinha AK, Yadav AL and Phadke NL (2019). Factors affecting conception rate in A.I. bred buffalo under field conditions of Bihar state. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 89(1):110-112.

Barcellos JOJ, Silva MDDA and Silva JLCDA (1996). Effects of early weaning on conception rate in Santa Gertrudis cows. Econ. Ecol. Rurales 96:39-47.

Bhagat RL and Gokhale SB (1999). Factors affecting conception rate in cows under field condition. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 52(2):298-302.

Bhagat RL and Gokhale SB (2016). Studies on factors influencing conception rate in rural cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 86(5):550-52.

Bhagat RL, Gokhale SB, Gokhale RB, Pande AB and Karbade VG (2009). Reproduction attributes affecting conception rate in crossbred cattle. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 27(1-2):169-72.

Bhave KG, Khadse JR, Gaundare YS and Mangurkar BR (2016). Factor affecting conception rate in AI bred buffaloes in field conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 86(12):1401-04.

Dhaware SA, Vaidya MS, Nandedkar PV, Yeotikar PV, Dongre VB, Kokate LS and Gaikwad RP (2022). Detailed analysis of the productive and reproductive traits of Marathwadi buffaloes. Ruminant Science 11(1):45-48.

Gokhale SB and Bhagat RL (2015). Inseminator attributes affecting conception rate in crossbred cattle. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 33(3):2373-76.

Gunasekaran M, Singh C and Gupta AK (2008). Effect of estrus behaviour on fertility in crossbred cattle. Indian Veterinary Journal 85:159-63.

Ismail SMA and Bhagat RL (2022). A study on conception rate in artificially inseminated buffaloes under field conditions of Telangana State. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 15(1):37-42.

Kumar S and Bhat PN (1979). Reproductive performance of Hariyana cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 49(12):1001-1008

Madushanka DNN, Ranasingha VM, Bandara AMS, Mayurawansha WRAS and Magamage MPS (2016). Body condition score and locomotion score help to predict reproductive and health performances of dairy cattle. Ruminant Science 5(2):179-186.

Mufti MMR, Alam MK, Sarker MS, Bostami ABMR and Das NG (2010). Study on factors affecting the conception rate in red Chittagong cows. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science 39(1&2):52-57.

Pandey AK and Kumar S (2003). Constraints in adoption of artificial insemination by dairy farmers in Jharkhand state. Journal of Research 15(2):289-290.

Pandey AK, Singh MP, Bansal SK and Gokhale SB (2016). Response of rural cattle to artificial insemination in Jharkhand. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 69(5): 600–04.

Potdar V, Bhave K, Gaundare Y, Awasthi HR and Khadse JR (2016). Factors influencing conception rate of local and crossbred cows. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 9(10):51-54.

Potdar V, Gaundare Y, Khadse J, Joshi, S and Swaminathan M (2020). Factors affecting conception rate in Holstein Friesian crossbreed cattle in Maharashtra State, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 9(3):2336-2341.

Qureshi AM, Kahlid J, Jarral ZA and Khan SA (2008). Environmental factors affecting performance traits of crossbred and local dairy cows at Mirpur Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 45(2):362-71.

Raju MS and Rao AR (1982). Note on semen characteristics of cross bred and pure bred bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 52(11):1230-1232.

Razi KMA, Asgar MA, Kabir MH, BagMAS and Parvez MM (2010). A study on estimation of conception rate and services per conception in cattle after artificial insemination. International Journal of Biological Research 2(7):25-29.

Sharma RC and Bhatnagar DS (1975). Influence of sex of the calf and order of lactation on the reproductive efficiency in dairy animals. The Indian Veterinary Journal 52 (8):813-822.

Shindey DN, Dhanvijay RW, Bhagat RLand Gokhale SB (2014). A note on conception rate in animals of Wardha district in Vidharbha region of Maharashtra State. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 32(3-4):595-99.

Singh Rana Ranjeet, Dubey Piyush, Choudhary SS, Kumar Amit, Patel NB and Singh VK (2017). Influence of body condition score on milk yield and reproduction parameters in surti buffaloes. Ruminant Science 6(1):99-102.

Singh AP, Chakravarty AK and Mir MA (2018). Breeding performance of Murrah buffaloes in organised herd. Ruminant Science 7(2):207-212.

Thirunavukkaras M and Karthivaran G (2009). Factors affecting conception rates in artificially inseminated Bovines. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79(9):200-209.

Valsalan Jamuna, Sadan Tina, Anilkumar K and Aravindakshan TV (2021). Evaluation of nongenetic factors affecting reproduction and production traits in crossbred dairy cattle of Kerala. Ruminant Science 10(1):37-42.

Vishwanath R (2003). Artificial insemination: The state of the art. Theriogenology 59:571-584.